Comments for Patrick Simpson

Comment on We are all valuable. Except for bankers. by Patrick

Patrick — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:35:58 +0000

Stop ruining the world then!

Comment on We are all valuable. Except for bankers. by Berrytrees

Berrytrees — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:33:43 +0000

I’m a banker you Ke$ha loving douche.

Comment on Cold War Kids – Behave Yourself EP by Mark

Mark — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:05:46 +0000

I’m a massive fan of the more-music-less-rant approach, but don’t give up on ranting altogether… I need my occasional hit of cynicism.

Comment on We are all valuable. Except for bankers. by Mark

Mark — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:05:18 +0000

He’s back! And on fine form Mr Simpson. Keep em’ coming!

Comment on Boys will be boys. Even at 67. by antoinet

antoinet — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:19:46 +0000

Complicated topic … It’s quite difficult to take such clear positions.

First, In French, “jeunes garcons” is ambiguous and not the same as “young boys”. Young boys refers to boys before 13. In French, it means teenager before 18, or younger, it depends.
I’d say that “little boys” is from 5 to 10, “young boys” from 10 to 18, and young man “jeune homme”, from 18 to 24 or so.

Second, Frederic Mitterand is a person that “builds up” on words. He exagerates, all the time, about anything. Any event in his mouth is transformed as spectacular, innovative, incredible. He describes reality in an exagerated way.

So … Has he exagerated while describing young men into young boys? I don’t know. He paid for sex, for sure. If he really had sex with young boys, he should be judged.
About Polanski, if he raped a 13 year’s old girl, I think he should be judged, and that’s it.

Let’s not forget that the far right raised this question by reading a chapter of Mitterand’s book on TV, and changed the word “young boys” into “little boys” to make it more scandalous. The far right always intends to drop the confidence into moderate politics.
So I’m careful and waiting for proofs before deciding if someone is guilty.

Comment on The horrors I’ve seen by Rainwoman

Rainwoman — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 07:50:46 +0000

Cute… I’ve got complete trust in your intentions.
But no, I’ll put my own spell on him.

Comment on The horrors I’ve seen by Patrick

Patrick — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 06:20:11 +0000

My intention is never to offend anyone (bwahaha, yeah right). If you did feel offended, perhaps you can use a Harry Potter take-away-real-world-and-escape-into-fantasy spell?

Comment on The horrors I’ve seen by Rainwoman

Rainwoman — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:50:42 +0000

Yeah, that’s what I thought, but do add a robe, it would totally complete the picture.
As a matter of fact, why don’t I bring both tomorrow? As an HP lover I’ve got those items lying around, of course.
And about that severely-victimised-threat: I laugh in the face of danger. Whahaha! (oh, sorry, Disney-reference)
xoxo
PS What’s so strange about that Miss South Carolina girl? (o shoot, I can’t hold a straight face with this one… never mind)
PPS Hey, should I feel offended by your last paragraph? I only wanted to share with you the joys of Hogwarts and Quidditch, as I experienced them.

Comment on The horrors I’ve seen by hyperstruct

hyperstruct — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:12:50 +0000

Oh, s**t.

Comment on The horrors I’ve seen by Patrick

Patrick — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:59:02 +0000

Come to think of it, there isn’t anything I can think of that would look more like a wizard than him in a pointy hat. I’m going to sue him too. How about we make it a class action?